Whait is Tech Lit? - link




Resources and links
Help build this site

Nae Tech Lit Program - link
Other NAE Links
NAE Tech Lit Program
Other NAE Programs
NAE Member Directory

Technological Determinism  (Print This)


Some believe that technological change is somehow disconnected from human influence. Technology seems to appear "out of the blue" with little if any input from its intended users. Technology has a dramatic, direct, one-way effect on our lives. In other words, technology affects society, but society does not affect technology. This idea, sometimes called technological determinism, suggests that technology follows its own course independent of human direction.

Technological determinism is based on a misperception of the central role people play in the design and uses of technology. Members of Congress, company CEOs and the scientists and engineers who work for them. and the consuming public all have a say in what technology should do, what it is capable of doing, and what it actually does. Technology mirrors our values, as well as our flaws.

If we perceive technology through the lens of technological determinism, we cannot weigh the risks or costs associated with a technology or its benefits. Certain technologies are used in ways that some people find objectionable or that result in unintended and sometimes undesirable consequences. And almost always, technologies are more advantageous for some people, animals, plants, generations, or purposes, than others. If one views technology as being outside human control, these considerations may never come up.

Thoughtful consideration of the technological advantages and disadvantages is extremely important, therefore, before a technology is developed. At the same time, we must recognize that perfectly sensible uses of a technology can sometimes have undesirable consequences and that these may not show up for decades or even longer. We may decide, therefore, that not every possible technological advance-human cloning, for example-should be pursued. Or, conversely, we may decide a technology should be developed for the greater good, even though a vocal minority opposes it. In either case, the decision is ours!

More Information Banner
Postman, N. 1993. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Tenner, E. 1996. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Knopf.

Winner, L. 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.



Copyright 2001, The National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved.