Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm Yochai Benkler† characteristics that make large-scale collaborations in many information production fields sustainable and productive in the digitally networked environment without reliance either on markets or managerial hierarchy. 374 Commons-based peer production, the emerging third model of production I describe here, relies on decentralized information gathering and exchange to reduce the uncertainty of participants. It has particular advantages as an information process for identifying and allocating human creativity available to work on information and cultural resources. It depends on very large aggregations of individuals independently scouring their information environment in search of opportunities to be creative in small or large increments. These individuals then self-identify for tasks and perform them for a variety of motivational reasons that I discuss at some length. 375-375 other model different to market and firm models of organization organized on either a market-based or a managerial/hierarchical model Peer production has an advantage over firms and markets because it allows larger groups of individuals to scour larger groups of resources in search of materials, projects, collaborations, and combinations than is possible for firms or individuals who function in markets. Transaction costs associated with property and contract limit the access of people to each other, to resources, and to projects when production is organized on a market or firm model, but not when it is organized on a peer production model. 376-377 academic enterprise, and in particular scientific research. Thousands of individuals make contributions to a body of knowledge, set up internal systems of quality control, and produce the core of our information and knowledge environment. 381 knowledge commons The advantages of peer production are, then, improved identification and allocation of human creativity. 377 ubiquitous computer communications networks are bringing about a dramatic change in the scope, scale, and efficacy of peer production. As computers and network connections become faster, cheaper, and more ubiquitous, we are seeing the phenomenon of nonprofessional peer production of information scale to much larger sizes and perform more complex tasks than were possible in the past for nonprofessional production. 383 volunteer effort Wikipedia provides a rich example of a medium-sized collection of individuals who successfully collaborate to create an information product of mid- to highbrow quality. In particular, it suggests that even in a group of this size, social norms coupled with a simple facility to allow any participant to edit out blatant opinion written by another in contravention of the social norms keep the group on track. 387 Peer production is emerging as an important mode of information production because of four attributes of the pervasively networked information economy. 404 peer production may be less costly than property/market-based production or organizational production 403 examples of peer prod: the Wikipedia project.33 The project involves roughly 2000 volunteers who are collaborating to write an encyclopedia. The project runs on a free software collaborative authorship tool, Wiki, which is a markup language similar in concept to HTML, but is relatively easier to implement, allows multiple people to edit a single document and interlock multiple documents, and generates archives of the changes made to each. Project Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders. Project Gutenberg59 is a collaboration of hundreds of volunteers who scan in and correct books so that they are freely available in digital form. Slashdot Perhaps the most elaborate multilayer mechanism for peer production of relevance and accreditation is Slashdot.50 Billed as “News for Nerds,” Slashdot primarily consists of users commenting on initial submissions that cover a variety of technology-related topics.